The impact of the
Upper Pripyat
river deepening works on the hydrological regime of Aquatic Warbler
breeding habitats.
More than 80 % of
Ukrainian Aquatic Warblers breeds in Pripyat valley. Most of the
territory is strictly protected by national and international
legislation. Nevertheless, there is a serious threat for AW habitats
in the Pripyat valley. The approved flood abatement program
"Ecology-2010" in fact is a hidden draining of Pripyat floodplain
and has already caused severe ecological damage.
The first stage of
Pripyat river-bed deepening was carried out in 2004-2005 between
Schedrogir village (Pidgirya village) and Turiya river mouth. Near 5
km of river-bed were deepen (Map 1).In 2006 the bed deepening
resulted in water level decrease in parts of the floodplain located
in more than 1 km from the river, including for example haymaking
fields near Krupyne lake and in opposite to low part of Pidgirya
village. Sedge tussocks, among which there usually should be water,
now are on the dry ground. There is no water in the floodplain for
up 4 km downstream from the bridge, though this part of the river
had always relatively high level of ground water. The level of water
has become on 0,5-1,0 m below the ground. Despite the water-blocking
influence of the bridge dam, the negative impact was shown in 2006
even for the upstream floodplain part in 1.5-2 km from the road
Pidgirya-Schedrogir, where the monitoring plot is located (Fig.1).
The second stage: in
December 2006 the river bed was deepened for 2 km upstream from the
bridge in Schedrogir village (Map 2). These works have strongly
lowered a water level in the monitoring plot (Fig. 1). But this
deepening of the river has not affected on breeding sites which are
located upstream of the river (area of lake Strybuzh) due to a small
height in the floodplain.
In 2007 the last stage
of river-bed deepening was executed in this part of floodplain (Map
3). The deepening of river-bed was made on reach of channel, which
crossed the height. As a result the level of water has dropped
significantly (more than 0,5 m) in the sites of the floodplain
including lake Strybuzh.
In May and June 2008
level of water in the Pripyat river floodplain was the highest for
recent years (corresponding months) (Fig 2). The water table was
high in the inter stream of Pripyat and Tsyr, in the mire “Zalissya”,
in the parts of the floodplain to the west from Shlapan village, in
the mire “Vizhery” in Turiya river valley. However, the deepening of
the river caused a low water level in the floodplain between
Richytsya village and Turiya river mouth (Fig 1).
The table shows the
decrease of number of AW at the sites affected by river deepening
works:
|
Year |
Breeding site |
|
Pripyat valley
between Retchica and Pidgirye (Shchedrogir) |
Pripyat valley
between Pidgirya and Turiya mouth |
|
Monitoring plot
(28 ha) |
Total |
Plot
(~20 ha) |
Total |
|
2004 |
24 males |
300-350 males |
20 males |
120-150 |
|
2005 |
13 |
150-170 |
0 |
10-20 |
|
2006 |
20 |
240-270 |
10 |
40-60 |
|
2007 |
13 |
120-150 |
2 |
30-40 |
|
2008 |
13 |
80-100 |
2 |
15-20 |
In 2006, there was also
another river-bed part deepened downstream from Vetly village. The
length of the dredged part is 1.5 km. This was enough to
substantially lower the water level in the nearby floodplain,
including the monitoring site (Map 4). In 2007 the water level there
was the lowest since 1995. In 2008 hydrological conditions were
optimal (the season was very rainy). Nevertheless deepening works
have lowered the level of water in monitoring plot on 10-30 cm
(Fig.3).
The number of AW at
these sites in 2008 was very low in spite of abundant
precipitations. Estimates of USPB, BirdLife International partner in
Ukraine, show that consequences of the Pripyat floodplain drainage
threat more than 1,000 males. Therefore, urgent actions are needed
to prevent harmful effects of planned and ongoing hydrotechnical
activities.
A group of experts,
including the representatives of RSPB, APB-BirdLife Belarus, USPB
and Michael Succow Foundation carried out a site visit. As a result
a plan of urgent actions has been developed. USPB has launched a
lobby campaign to stop such projects; and more survey data is needed
to justify the lobby and conduct it effectively.
Please, read also
USPB AW
monitoring report 2007.
For
more information contact: Anatoly Poluda,
USPB
(polud@izan.kiev.ua)
|
Fig 1. Dynamic of water level at
the monitoring plot "Pidgirya" and waterpost "Lyubyaz" in the
Pripyat valley.

Fig 2. Dynamic of water level at
the flood-lands of the Pripyat river on waterpost "Lyubyaz"

Fig 3. Dynamic of water level at
the monitoring plot "Vetly" and waterpost "Lyubyaz" in the Pripyat
valley

|